Not an Object, Not an attention seeker, and Definitely not Inferior

https://feministandgenderlens.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/modern-feminism1.jpg?w=300

This week I’ve finished reading the novel Lullabies for Little Criminals and wow! Was this book an experience. For those who’ve been following up with my recent posts will know how this novel mainly focuses on drugs, bad parenting, sex and prostitution. All topics that are controversial and not common to young kids. This novel was definitely a chilling experience that taught me many life lessons and made me realize how our society is not at it’s finest.

Looking from a feminist point of view, this novel definitely had some ups and down when it came to gender roles and how they were perceived. The men in this novel were regularly shown to be dominant, and the woman were seen to be inferior.

One thing I found especially interesting was that women weren’t women and men weren’t men.

Confusing right?

What I mean is, women were seen as sexual objects and nothing more, while most men were seen as monsters, abusers, sex-driven maniacs and even manipulators.

When it came to woman, the men in these societies did not see them for who they were, let alone their personalities, but for their image. A girl could look as beautiful as a flower and have the nastiest personally, yet men would still approach her to satisfy their own obsessive pleasure solely based on appearance. This idea is mostly explored through the eyes of the local pimp, Alphonse.

One of the biggest evils in Baby’s lives was, without a doubt, Alphonse. He manipulated pretty girls with affection and sexual gifts to use them for his own benefit. Unfortunately, Baby walks right into his trap and begins to look for his attention, eventually getting swayed by his gifts and sweet commentary.

Alphonse is literally THE perfect example of how men saw women as nothing more than sexual objects, as he begins to show interest in Baby only after she dresses more daringly. When Baby first saw Alphonse, she mentioned, “Although Alphonse was terribly interested in women, he never seemed to notice me. But that’s because I wasn’t really a woman” (O’Neill, 149). By saying this, we see how Alphonse had little to no interest in Baby as she wasn’t “really a woman” implementing that she didn’t have the looks or features of a typical female.

Yet, when Baby started wearing more exposing and “foxier” cloths like Zoe and some of the other prostitutes, Alphonse interest developed faster than a cheetahs run.  Suddenly he had his eyes on her, and even went as far as calling her a “hot tamale” (155) and sending her things he thought would look good on her.

Another example of how men saw women as sexual objects were with the idea of prostitutes. When Alphonse forced Baby into prostitution, he would make her sit outside on a bench looking all pretty and dolled up, waiting for men to have a look at her and decide if they wanted to have sex. Alphonse put her on display as if she was a trophy, not in a proud way, but in a bragging way. They would wait all day for “offers” to come in, and once they did, he would make her have sex, no questions asked.

He never had her best interests in mind; he only thought of her as an outlet for making money. He convinced her of becoming a prostitute and encouraged her to sell her body. To him, she was an object that could be tucked away on a far shelf and pulled out whenever he needed. And if that object ever faltered or got stuck on the shelf, he would abuse it out with anger until he got what he wanted.

Male dominance is another aspect we see through Alphonse and even Baby’s own father, Jules. When Baby decides to go back to school, she meets an odd boy named Xavier. Unlike most men in society, he was portrayed as kind, innocent and someone who didn’t want to take advantage of her. Eventually, they started dating and decided to have sex. The only place Baby could think of was Alphonse’s apartment as she expected he wouldn’t be there.

https://leappakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/domestic-violence.jpg

However, as I suspected, Alphonse walked in and saw what was happening. He took hold of  Xavier and beat him up. I was taken by surprise when Baby yelled: “Let him go!” (306). She took control of the situation and mustered the courage to go against his wishes. She used her power as a woman and used her voice to say what was only right. Yet for her act of courage, she was rewarded with a slap. After finally doing what needed to be done, she didn’t get a courageous pat on the back but instead got a red mark on her face. “I didn’t feel any pain when Alphonse slapped me on both sides of my face. I could feel both my cheeks getting all warm and tingly” (O’Neill 306). All because she finally did something for herself and on her own will. No one should ever lay a hand on someone else, but because men were accustomed to being better, this type of behaviour was allowed and acceptable. No questions asked. After all, he was the mighty man, and she was a lifeless stripper.

Jules, on the other hand, also shows dominance over Baby as he decides what she should or shouldn’t do. He continuously restricts her in all sorts of ways. As Baby mentioned, “I couldn’t dress like that or Jules would throw a fit. He didn’t even let me braid my hair. He thought that Bobby pins were invented solely for attracting black men” (150). Not only does this show that Baby couldn’t do some of the simplest things, but it also shows how men could restrict women in what they wear and who they can and can’t hang out with.

Serial: 15 years later

https://pmcvariety.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/serial-season-3-emmanuel-dzotsi_sarah-koenig.jpg?w=1000&h=563&crop=1

I just finished listening to the “Serial” podcast series hosted by Sarah Koenig and all I’ve got to say is “wow that’s a lot”. Speaking honestly, I had no idea what this series was about until only a little while ago. I hopped online and looked at a brief overview,  to my surprise, I found the story very interesting. I wanted to know what happened and what came next. As I started to go through the series I felt a lot of different emotions, like being confused and intrigued.


For starters, I liked this podcast because it’s attention-grabbing and it lets me visualize the events as they unfold. I was not able to physically see the people but just listen to their story so it was very refreshing to hear the emotion from another voice. I also liked this podcast because it had many different perspectives, aside from the main narrator. It was interesting to see the story from the accused himself, as well as those close to him. It not only gave me a larger aspect to form my opinion but gave me more detail about the case.


As many of you know, this podcast was created based on a true story and like always, whenever something is based on a true story it makes the actual story 10x scarier since you know it actually happened. As I was researching more about Serial, I realized just how popular it is. While listening to the story, some parts got me shivering, which got me thinking about the victims family. They might feel uneasy or even frighten since a private matter has become so public. People have already started to form opinions, which could be damaging to the family. I hope they take this opportunity to share their experience with others and show people how important it is to know all the details regarding any type of case.


Speaking of details, one thing I realized was that the court system seemed flawed as they didn’t have all the details to this case. They didn’t do a proper check of what happened nor did they bring up anything related to Asia’s letter. Even after it was revealed who she was, the court said not to contact her even though she was with him at the time of the crime which could’ve ultimately proven his innocence. Questions like “Why was she not presented at the trail? Did the court purposely try covering it up? were the type that kept coming to mind.


  Serial has actually been my first podcast ever. I was always the type to read since reading the words help me understand better. On a personal level, one of the drawbacks towards the podcast was that there was no text. There were times where I couldn’t understand what was being said since it was either badly recorded or wasn’t clearly spoken. I would try listening to the part again but even then, I still couldn’t understand it. There were also times where I missed a few words so I would try to go back, but it was very hard to find the exact spot. I would either skip too far back or too ahead. While reading, it is unlikely to miss pages and easier to go back since there are page numbers. You can also access a book any time whereas, your phone might die and you won’t be able to listen to a podcast.


Overall, for my first podcast, I think it was a pretty good experience. Although I prefer reading, podcasts allow emotion to be shown and allows readers to see the story in another perspective which can be very cool. I don’t know if I’ll continue listening, but so far it was interesting and well put together as it showed all the side to the story.

-Z.K